SUNDAY MORNING HIGHLIGHTS
Lots of things this morning that need attention:
- The Arizona 9/11 Memorial. The quotations to memorialize our loss appear to layout all the things we did wrong and our self-flagellating responsiblity in the event. Read those keeping track... ACE, Espresso Pundits pictures, HotAir.
- Sweetness & Light hits on the Chavez rant on worthless American dollars. Read Professor Bainbridge as well on this.
RE: CLINTON'S DEFENSE OF HIS LEGACY ON FOX - I want to post one other thing I found on Free Republic. This is my recollection as well, but looking for comments:
After reading parts of the FoxNews Sunday transcript of the interview between Wallace and Clinton, something stuck out to me.
Clinton keeps claiming that 'right wing conservatives' were constantly complaining that he was too obsessed with bin Laden. I have mentioned previous that I have no memories of that happening. What I do remember is conservatives in general complaining about his obsession with Monica.
But, getting back to that claim that conservatives were complaining that Clinton was too obsessed with bin Laden.
After watching the rant, oops, interview, Clinton slipped up. He showed his cards by uttering three little words: wag the dog.
It was like a light bulb going off in my head.
Now it made sense. Clinton is once again 'mixing' historical events to conform to what he wants the world to remember.
Conservatives did use the wag the dog reference numerous times, not in reference to bin Laden, but in reference to Clinton's massive bombardment of Serbia, which had absolutely nothing to do with bin Laden.
Clinton, in the interview basically says, and I paraphrase:
conservatives were complaining that I was obsessed with bin Laden, you know the wag the dog references.
THAT is the statement that shows that either Clinton is having memory problems and mixing up events, or is lying.
All the wag the dog references in the 90's had nothing to do with bin Laden, but had everything to do with Serbia and Milosevic, as far as my meager memory serves. I may be wrong, and I may be unaware of statements to the contrary but as far as I can remember, all those references were regarding Milosevic and Serbia.




Reader Comments